Stonehenge aurait été bâti 500 ans plus tôt au Pays de Galles
2 participants
La préhistoire en Lorraine :: Palabres autour du feu :: La Préhistoire sur le Web :: dans le reste de l'Europe
Page 1 sur 1
Stonehenge aurait été bâti 500 ans plus tôt au Pays de Galles
Stonehenge was built in Wales and 'dragged off' to Wiltshire 500 years later, study suggests
Holes found cut into rocky outcrops near the Preseli Hills in Pembrokeshire match the stones of the famous monument
Stonehenge Getty
Stonehenge could have been first built in what is now Wales where it remained for 500 years until it was “dismantled and dragged off” to Wiltshire, archaeologists have suggested.
The claim followed the “fantastic” discovery of holes cut into rocky outcrops near the Preseli Hills in Pembrokeshire that match the stones of the famous monument but which were cut centuries before it was built, The Guardian reported.
Stonehenge: Temple near site shows evidence of a religious revolution - when Britons switched from worshipping landscape features to a solar cult
The holes have been dated to between 3,400 and 3,200 BC but Stonehenge was not created in Wiltshire until 2,900 BC.
Professor Mike Parker Pearson, of University College London, said: “It could have taken nearly 500 years to get them to Stonehenge, but that’s pretty improbable in my view.
“It’s more likely that the stones were first used in a local monument, somewhere near the quarries, that was then dismantled and dragged off to Wiltshire.”
He suggested that the “first Stonehenge” was in Wales and “what we’re seeing at Stonehenge [in Wiltshire] is a second-hand monument”.
“Normally we don’t get to make that many fantastic discoveries. But this is one,” he said.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/archaeology/stonehenge-was-built-in-wales-and-dragged-off-to-wiltshire-500-years-later-study-suggests-a6762916.html
Holes found cut into rocky outcrops near the Preseli Hills in Pembrokeshire match the stones of the famous monument
Stonehenge Getty
Stonehenge could have been first built in what is now Wales where it remained for 500 years until it was “dismantled and dragged off” to Wiltshire, archaeologists have suggested.
The claim followed the “fantastic” discovery of holes cut into rocky outcrops near the Preseli Hills in Pembrokeshire that match the stones of the famous monument but which were cut centuries before it was built, The Guardian reported.
Stonehenge: Temple near site shows evidence of a religious revolution - when Britons switched from worshipping landscape features to a solar cult
The holes have been dated to between 3,400 and 3,200 BC but Stonehenge was not created in Wiltshire until 2,900 BC.
Professor Mike Parker Pearson, of University College London, said: “It could have taken nearly 500 years to get them to Stonehenge, but that’s pretty improbable in my view.
“It’s more likely that the stones were first used in a local monument, somewhere near the quarries, that was then dismantled and dragged off to Wiltshire.”
He suggested that the “first Stonehenge” was in Wales and “what we’re seeing at Stonehenge [in Wiltshire] is a second-hand monument”.
“Normally we don’t get to make that many fantastic discoveries. But this is one,” he said.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/archaeology/stonehenge-was-built-in-wales-and-dragged-off-to-wiltshire-500-years-later-study-suggests-a6762916.html
Re: Stonehenge aurait été bâti 500 ans plus tôt au Pays de Galles
Intéressant, ce site n'a pas encore livré ses secrets
Perceval- Messages : 2593
Date d'inscription : 02/11/2011
Localisation : Ile de France
Sujets similaires
» La mythique «pierre de soleil» des Vikings aurait été trouvée
» le son de Stonehenge
» News from Stonehenge
» le son de Stonehenge
» News from Stonehenge
La préhistoire en Lorraine :: Palabres autour du feu :: La Préhistoire sur le Web :: dans le reste de l'Europe
Page 1 sur 1
Permission de ce forum:
Vous ne pouvez pas répondre aux sujets dans ce forum
|
|
Dim 28 Mar 2021 - 13:16 par Sapiens88
» Les objets de parure associés au dépôt funéraire mésolithique de Große Ofnet : implications pour la compréhension de l’organisation sociale des dernières sociétés de chasseurs-cueilleurs du Jura Souabe
Dim 28 Mar 2021 - 13:10 par Sapiens88
» Les grands mammifères de la couche 5 de Mutzig I (Bas-Rhin). La subsistance au Paléolithique moyen en Alsace
Dim 28 Mar 2021 - 12:58 par Sapiens88
» Aspects of faunal exploitation in the Middle Palaeolithic : evidence from Wallertheim (Rheinhessen, Germany)
Dim 28 Mar 2021 - 12:41 par Sapiens88
» Middle Paleolithic subsistence in the central Rhine Valley
Dim 28 Mar 2021 - 12:33 par Sapiens88
» Broadening and diversification of hunted resources, from the Late Palaeolithic to the Late Mesolithic, in the North and East of France and the bordering areas
Dim 28 Mar 2021 - 12:26 par Sapiens88
» Les boules de loess d’Achenheim et les "Lihtte Mirr". Essai de paléo-ethnographie comparée
Dim 25 Aoû 2019 - 10:28 par Sapiens88
» Les galets tronqués à base plane des lœss de la terrasse de Hangenbieten
Dim 25 Aoû 2019 - 9:57 par Sapiens88
» Néolithique "initial"', néolithique ancien et néolithisation dans l'espace centre-européen : une vision rénovée
Sam 17 Aoû 2019 - 20:06 par Sapiens88
» La période néolithique en Alsace (5300-2300 av. J.-C.). Présentation générale et apports des recherches récentes [1988]
Sam 10 Aoû 2019 - 15:21 par Sapiens88