New Dates for Little Foot
Page 1 sur 1
New Dates for Little Foot
New Dates for Little Foot
Monday, March 17, 2014
(Ron Clarke/University of Witwatersrand)
http://archaeology.org/news/1908-140317-little-foot-dates
PARIS, FRANCE—A new geological study of the Sterkfontein caves in Gauteng, South Africa, concludes that the nearly complete Australopithecus prometheus skeleton known as Little Foot is at least three million years old. Ron Clarke, Stephen Motsumi, and Nkwane Molefe of the University of Witwatersrand spent 13 years extracting the skeleton from the rock of the cave so that they could understand how it had been encased in the hard, calcified sediment. According to a report in Science Now, the scientists found that the skeleton had been disturbed and broken, and that it would have taken at least one million years to fill in the spaces between the bones with minerals carried by water flowing through the cave. The flowstone itself has been dated to 2.2 million years old. The new, older dates suggest that Little Foot could be a Homo ancestor.
Monday, March 17, 2014
(Ron Clarke/University of Witwatersrand)
http://archaeology.org/news/1908-140317-little-foot-dates
PARIS, FRANCE—A new geological study of the Sterkfontein caves in Gauteng, South Africa, concludes that the nearly complete Australopithecus prometheus skeleton known as Little Foot is at least three million years old. Ron Clarke, Stephen Motsumi, and Nkwane Molefe of the University of Witwatersrand spent 13 years extracting the skeleton from the rock of the cave so that they could understand how it had been encased in the hard, calcified sediment. According to a report in Science Now, the scientists found that the skeleton had been disturbed and broken, and that it would have taken at least one million years to fill in the spaces between the bones with minerals carried by water flowing through the cave. The flowstone itself has been dated to 2.2 million years old. The new, older dates suggest that Little Foot could be a Homo ancestor.
Sujets similaires
» Préhistoire : dans les pas de Little Foot, nouveau doyen de l'humanité ?
» New Dates Obtained for Bog Bone Bundles
» RADIOCARBON DATES FROM THE OXFORD AMS SYSTEM: ARCHAEOMETRY DATELIST 18
» New Dates Obtained for Bog Bone Bundles
» RADIOCARBON DATES FROM THE OXFORD AMS SYSTEM: ARCHAEOMETRY DATELIST 18
Page 1 sur 1
Permission de ce forum:
Vous ne pouvez pas répondre aux sujets dans ce forum
Dim 15 Sep 2024 - 19:18 par Sapiens88
» Animals in Mesolithic Burials in Europe
Dim 28 Mar 2021 - 13:16 par Sapiens88
» Les objets de parure associés au dépôt funéraire mésolithique de Große Ofnet : implications pour la compréhension de l’organisation sociale des dernières sociétés de chasseurs-cueilleurs du Jura Souabe
Dim 28 Mar 2021 - 13:10 par Sapiens88
» Les grands mammifères de la couche 5 de Mutzig I (Bas-Rhin). La subsistance au Paléolithique moyen en Alsace
Dim 28 Mar 2021 - 12:58 par Sapiens88
» Aspects of faunal exploitation in the Middle Palaeolithic : evidence from Wallertheim (Rheinhessen, Germany)
Dim 28 Mar 2021 - 12:41 par Sapiens88
» Middle Paleolithic subsistence in the central Rhine Valley
Dim 28 Mar 2021 - 12:33 par Sapiens88
» Broadening and diversification of hunted resources, from the Late Palaeolithic to the Late Mesolithic, in the North and East of France and the bordering areas
Dim 28 Mar 2021 - 12:26 par Sapiens88
» Les boules de loess d’Achenheim et les "Lihtte Mirr". Essai de paléo-ethnographie comparée
Dim 25 Aoû 2019 - 10:28 par Sapiens88
» Les galets tronqués à base plane des lœss de la terrasse de Hangenbieten
Dim 25 Aoû 2019 - 9:57 par Sapiens88
» Néolithique "initial"', néolithique ancien et néolithisation dans l'espace centre-européen : une vision rénovée
Sam 17 Aoû 2019 - 20:06 par Sapiens88