Neurobiologists Tackle Questions of Bipedialism and Tool Use
Page 1 sur 1
Neurobiologists Tackle Questions of Bipedialism and Tool Use
Japanese anthropologists and neurobiologists who have analyzed 4.4 million-year-old Ardipithecus ramidus fossils and compared modern monkey and human behavior now conclude that our ancestors developed the ability to use tools before they were able to walk upright.
Neurobiologists Tackle Questions of Bipedialism and Tool Use
Share
Tuesday, October 08, 2013
(Image courtesy of RIKEN)
TOKYO, JAPAN—It had been thought that fine manual dexterity evolved in human ancestors after they freed their hands with bipedal locomotion, but new research suggests that hominids were able to use tools before they developed the ability to walk upright. Neurobiologist Atsushi Iriki and anthropologist Gen Suwa of the University of Tokyo Museum, and scientists from the RIKEN Brain Science Institute, examined monkey and human behavior, and fossil evidence from 4.4-million-year-old Ardipithecus ramidus. They also created somatotopic maps of the areas of monkey and human brains responsible for touch awareness in individual fingers and toes. The researchers found that primate and human fingers are all represented independently on a touch map. And, while all of a monkey’s toes are combined in a single map, human big toes have their own map. “In early quadruped hominids, finger control and tool use were feasible, while an independent adaptation involving the use of the big toe for functions like balance and walking occurred with bipediality,” they said.
http://archaeology.org/news/1376-131008-hominids-dexterity-bipedalism
Neurobiologists Tackle Questions of Bipedialism and Tool Use
Share
Tuesday, October 08, 2013
(Image courtesy of RIKEN)
TOKYO, JAPAN—It had been thought that fine manual dexterity evolved in human ancestors after they freed their hands with bipedal locomotion, but new research suggests that hominids were able to use tools before they developed the ability to walk upright. Neurobiologist Atsushi Iriki and anthropologist Gen Suwa of the University of Tokyo Museum, and scientists from the RIKEN Brain Science Institute, examined monkey and human behavior, and fossil evidence from 4.4-million-year-old Ardipithecus ramidus. They also created somatotopic maps of the areas of monkey and human brains responsible for touch awareness in individual fingers and toes. The researchers found that primate and human fingers are all represented independently on a touch map. And, while all of a monkey’s toes are combined in a single map, human big toes have their own map. “In early quadruped hominids, finger control and tool use were feasible, while an independent adaptation involving the use of the big toe for functions like balance and walking occurred with bipediality,” they said.
http://archaeology.org/news/1376-131008-hominids-dexterity-bipedalism
Sujets similaires
» Language and Tool-Making Evolved Simultaneously
» Shape Variation in Aterian Tanged Tools and the Origins of Projectile Technology: A Morphometric Perspective on Stone Tool Function
» Experimental evidence for the co-evolution of hominin tool-making teaching and language
» Shape Variation in Aterian Tanged Tools and the Origins of Projectile Technology: A Morphometric Perspective on Stone Tool Function
» Experimental evidence for the co-evolution of hominin tool-making teaching and language
Page 1 sur 1
Permission de ce forum:
Vous ne pouvez pas répondre aux sujets dans ce forum
Dim 28 Mar 2021 - 13:16 par Sapiens88
» Les objets de parure associés au dépôt funéraire mésolithique de Große Ofnet : implications pour la compréhension de l’organisation sociale des dernières sociétés de chasseurs-cueilleurs du Jura Souabe
Dim 28 Mar 2021 - 13:10 par Sapiens88
» Les grands mammifères de la couche 5 de Mutzig I (Bas-Rhin). La subsistance au Paléolithique moyen en Alsace
Dim 28 Mar 2021 - 12:58 par Sapiens88
» Aspects of faunal exploitation in the Middle Palaeolithic : evidence from Wallertheim (Rheinhessen, Germany)
Dim 28 Mar 2021 - 12:41 par Sapiens88
» Middle Paleolithic subsistence in the central Rhine Valley
Dim 28 Mar 2021 - 12:33 par Sapiens88
» Broadening and diversification of hunted resources, from the Late Palaeolithic to the Late Mesolithic, in the North and East of France and the bordering areas
Dim 28 Mar 2021 - 12:26 par Sapiens88
» Les boules de loess d’Achenheim et les "Lihtte Mirr". Essai de paléo-ethnographie comparée
Dim 25 Aoû 2019 - 10:28 par Sapiens88
» Les galets tronqués à base plane des lœss de la terrasse de Hangenbieten
Dim 25 Aoû 2019 - 9:57 par Sapiens88
» Néolithique "initial"', néolithique ancien et néolithisation dans l'espace centre-européen : une vision rénovée
Sam 17 Aoû 2019 - 20:06 par Sapiens88
» La période néolithique en Alsace (5300-2300 av. J.-C.). Présentation générale et apports des recherches récentes [1988]
Sam 10 Aoû 2019 - 15:21 par Sapiens88