Explication de la forme particulière du visage de Néandertal
Page 1 sur 1
Explication de la forme particulière du visage de Néandertal
Neanderthals' distinctive face shape explained
7 December 2015
Cells in Neanderthals' upper jawbones continued adding bone tissue for years after childhood
Study reveals how Neanderthal faces changed throughout their lives to develop their characteristic protruding shape. Compared to the rest of the human family tree, it turns out that we - Homo sapiens - are the unusual ones.
Neanderthals' upper jawbones continued growing forwards for years after they were born, explaining the distinctive protruding face shape of this extinct human species.
Unlike modern humans, whose faces remain flat as they grow, Neanderthals had cells in their upper jawbones that continued producing bone tissue throughout their teenage years.
Because other ancient humans and early relatives like the australopithecines (southern apes) had a similarly protruding face, our flatter faces are unique among human species and may have emerged only very recently.
The five Neanderthal child skull fragments found at Devil's Tower in Gibraltar in 1926
The fossil was found in 1926 alongside four other skull fragments from the same child at a site in Gibraltar called Devil's Tower, and is now part of the Museum's collection.
'The Devil's Tower child died close to five years of age and this difference in facial growth from modern humans was already apparent by then,' says Museum human origins expert Professor Chris Stringer, who was part of the international team of researchers studying the fossils.
'This research shows how fossils found 90 years ago can still provide crucial information on human evolution through new investigative techniques.'
Reconstruction of the Devil's Tower Neanderthal child's face. By Guérin Nicolas (Own work) [CC BY-SA 3.0], via Wikimedia Commons.
In modern humans, this process sees bone tissue predominantly added to the upper parts of the face (the nose and forehead) and removed from the lower-middle area (especially the upper jawbone). This leaves us with a flatter face in adulthood.
Using a scanning electron microscope, the researchers found that the Neanderthal child from Gibraltar had many active cells responsible for building bone tissue (osteoblasts) in the upper jawbone, but no active cells responsible for breaking bone tissue down (osteoclasts).
This implies that the characteristic protruding upper jaw of Neanderthals was the result of extensive bone remodelling after birth - the exact opposite of modern humans, where bone remodelling results in a less prominent upper jaw.
Cellular analysis of the skulls of Neanderthals and the Sima de los Huesos hominins. Purple indicates the presence of cells for bone growth (deposition), and turquoise indicates cells for bone removal (resorption). © RS Lacruz, TG Bromage, P O'Higgins, JL Arsuaga, C Stringer, R Godinho, J Warshaw, I Martínez, A Gracia-Tellez, JM Bermúdez de Castro and E Carbonell
Given that most known species of ancient hominin had a similarly protruding face, the flatter shape of modern humans must have emerged only recently in our evolutionary history.
The researchers say that pinning down exactly when, where and why this happened should be the focus of future work.
'Our study shows that the faces of Neanderthals and modern humans differed in key developmental processes, allowing us to understand how some Neanderthal traits came about,' says co-author Dr Rodrigo Lacruz of New York University.
'In a sense, the Neanderthals are not a developmental oddity - we are.'
See more at: http://www.nhm.ac.uk/our-science/science-news/2015/december/neanderthals-distinctive-face-shape-explained.html?utm_source=hootsuite#sthash.VgYWRr75.dpuf
7 December 2015
Cells in Neanderthals' upper jawbones continued adding bone tissue for years after childhood
Study reveals how Neanderthal faces changed throughout their lives to develop their characteristic protruding shape. Compared to the rest of the human family tree, it turns out that we - Homo sapiens - are the unusual ones.
Neanderthals' upper jawbones continued growing forwards for years after they were born, explaining the distinctive protruding face shape of this extinct human species.
Unlike modern humans, whose faces remain flat as they grow, Neanderthals had cells in their upper jawbones that continued producing bone tissue throughout their teenage years.
Because other ancient humans and early relatives like the australopithecines (southern apes) had a similarly protruding face, our flatter faces are unique among human species and may have emerged only very recently.
The five Neanderthal child skull fragments found at Devil's Tower in Gibraltar in 1926
Devil's Tower specimen
The study, published in the journal Nature Communications today, focused on the upper jawbone of a Neanderthal child who was just under five years old at the time of death.The fossil was found in 1926 alongside four other skull fragments from the same child at a site in Gibraltar called Devil's Tower, and is now part of the Museum's collection.
'The Devil's Tower child died close to five years of age and this difference in facial growth from modern humans was already apparent by then,' says Museum human origins expert Professor Chris Stringer, who was part of the international team of researchers studying the fossils.
'This research shows how fossils found 90 years ago can still provide crucial information on human evolution through new investigative techniques.'
Reconstruction of the Devil's Tower Neanderthal child's face. By Guérin Nicolas (Own work) [CC BY-SA 3.0], via Wikimedia Commons.
Nature's nip and tuck
The different face shapes of apes, ancient humans and modern humans are in part a result of the ways skulls grow and develop after birth - a process known as bone remodelling.In modern humans, this process sees bone tissue predominantly added to the upper parts of the face (the nose and forehead) and removed from the lower-middle area (especially the upper jawbone). This leaves us with a flatter face in adulthood.
Using a scanning electron microscope, the researchers found that the Neanderthal child from Gibraltar had many active cells responsible for building bone tissue (osteoblasts) in the upper jawbone, but no active cells responsible for breaking bone tissue down (osteoclasts).
This implies that the characteristic protruding upper jaw of Neanderthals was the result of extensive bone remodelling after birth - the exact opposite of modern humans, where bone remodelling results in a less prominent upper jaw.
Cellular analysis of the skulls of Neanderthals and the Sima de los Huesos hominins. Purple indicates the presence of cells for bone growth (deposition), and turquoise indicates cells for bone removal (resorption). © RS Lacruz, TG Bromage, P O'Higgins, JL Arsuaga, C Stringer, R Godinho, J Warshaw, I Martínez, A Gracia-Tellez, JM Bermúdez de Castro and E Carbonell
A recent twist
The team found similar results in other Neanderthal fossils, as well as in a group of approximately 430,000-year-old hominins from Sima de Los Huesos in Spain who are thought to be ancestors of Neanderthals.Given that most known species of ancient hominin had a similarly protruding face, the flatter shape of modern humans must have emerged only recently in our evolutionary history.
The researchers say that pinning down exactly when, where and why this happened should be the focus of future work.
'Our study shows that the faces of Neanderthals and modern humans differed in key developmental processes, allowing us to understand how some Neanderthal traits came about,' says co-author Dr Rodrigo Lacruz of New York University.
'In a sense, the Neanderthals are not a developmental oddity - we are.'
- By Liam Proud
See more at: http://www.nhm.ac.uk/our-science/science-news/2015/december/neanderthals-distinctive-face-shape-explained.html?utm_source=hootsuite#sthash.VgYWRr75.dpuf
Sujets similaires
» Le visage de Néandertal
» Découverte récente au lazaret
» Burins carénés-nucléus à lamelles : identification d'une chaîne opératoire particulière à Thèmes (Yonne) et implications
» Découverte récente au lazaret
» Burins carénés-nucléus à lamelles : identification d'une chaîne opératoire particulière à Thèmes (Yonne) et implications
Page 1 sur 1
Permission de ce forum:
Vous ne pouvez pas répondre aux sujets dans ce forum
|
|
Dim 28 Mar 2021 - 13:16 par Sapiens88
» Les objets de parure associés au dépôt funéraire mésolithique de Große Ofnet : implications pour la compréhension de l’organisation sociale des dernières sociétés de chasseurs-cueilleurs du Jura Souabe
Dim 28 Mar 2021 - 13:10 par Sapiens88
» Les grands mammifères de la couche 5 de Mutzig I (Bas-Rhin). La subsistance au Paléolithique moyen en Alsace
Dim 28 Mar 2021 - 12:58 par Sapiens88
» Aspects of faunal exploitation in the Middle Palaeolithic : evidence from Wallertheim (Rheinhessen, Germany)
Dim 28 Mar 2021 - 12:41 par Sapiens88
» Middle Paleolithic subsistence in the central Rhine Valley
Dim 28 Mar 2021 - 12:33 par Sapiens88
» Broadening and diversification of hunted resources, from the Late Palaeolithic to the Late Mesolithic, in the North and East of France and the bordering areas
Dim 28 Mar 2021 - 12:26 par Sapiens88
» Les boules de loess d’Achenheim et les "Lihtte Mirr". Essai de paléo-ethnographie comparée
Dim 25 Aoû 2019 - 10:28 par Sapiens88
» Les galets tronqués à base plane des lœss de la terrasse de Hangenbieten
Dim 25 Aoû 2019 - 9:57 par Sapiens88
» Néolithique "initial"', néolithique ancien et néolithisation dans l'espace centre-européen : une vision rénovée
Sam 17 Aoû 2019 - 20:06 par Sapiens88
» La période néolithique en Alsace (5300-2300 av. J.-C.). Présentation générale et apports des recherches récentes [1988]
Sam 10 Aoû 2019 - 15:21 par Sapiens88